I hate what AI has started to force upon me, and what I have let it do.
My workplace moves fast, is messy, but believes that all motion is inherently good. Benchmarks are measured in lines of code, how many PRs were shipped, how many new features have been added. Caution is an absolute unknown, and restraint or recalcitrance is viewed with increased skepticism. We can’t slow down, speed is good, breaking things means we build them back, better. The only progress is through unchecked and uncritical iteration. We can only multiply, we will never subtract, divide and we will never EVER stop.
It’s exhausting. It’s maddening. And in an effort to keep pace, I have been forced to sacrifice my morals and my good judgement over and over again. I watch my colleagues automate their jobs away, and I begin to question how much I can continue to rely on their technical competence. Yet in the need to keep pace, I too must turn to the monster we’ve hitched ourselves to in an effort to not get left behind.
I immediately feel stupider. Issues that I once would properly think AROUND and think THROUGH immediately get derailed by an assertion that lines up on paper, but fundamentally fails to consider the breadth of the problem. If this answer is wrong, there is no lateral thinking to apply to understand why or reassess the approach. The sunk cost fallacy is too great and now I have to depend on The Machine to tell me the next answer.
I can feel my brain atrophying and I hate it. I see it in what I produce. My first project was a mess, but I understand it and all of its shortcomings. The second phase is a blur, looking at words I don’t remember writing and code that is unnecessary and inelegant brute force solutions to simple problems. The pride of a job well done is replaced with a begrudging acceptance of ‘good enough’, as the standards trend lower and lower. Another function uncritically copy/pasted. Another opportunity to learn dashed upon the lie of progress at all costs.
Yet I must persist, because the quality of my work is not being scrutinized, only the volume of my output. The elegant and resourceful functions I build take too long, they’re too mindful. Hand-writing the documentation to be human-readable is too slow, people want things to be written to be consumed by AI in this hellish ouroboros where we are actively removing our own agency and becoming bystanders to our own words and ideas. We create this degenerative feedback loop and demolish any possibility of expertise. It’s the ‘you will own nothing’ economy distilled to it’s final form. You no longer own your own thoughts, you give them away wholesale to The Machine, trading friction for the convenience of presumed clarity.
Is it really so uncomfortable to admit what we don’t know? Are we really in a rush to reach the ‘right’ answer that we don’t care to learn from the mistakes that were necessary to get us there? It flies in the face of every trite idiom we’ve ever subscribed to. The butterfly needs to struggle to emerge from the cocoon, the friction is painful but necessary. Parents need to watch their children fall to know that they will learn how to pick themselves back up again. We cannot become such dopamine addicted slaves to the euphoria of the easiest path, not only because of the humanity and agency that is lost in the bargain, but because it is fundamentally an illusion.
AI doesn’t just rob us of toil, it robs us of learning, of knowledge, of self-realization and growth. The use of AI in development should be called Arrested Development because that is truly what it is. The undisciplined mind will become stagnant and once AI has cannibalized every novel thought humanity has to offer, we will enter a stalemate of intellectual decline. The loss of the Library of Alexandria wasn’t only the loss of knowledge that has been, but loss of the knowledge that could be gained from it. We are the arbiters of our own existence, and we would rather shut ourselves away and listen to the regurgitated thoughts of our betters rather than pick up the damn pen and write and think and fail and learn and try.
I usually couch these thoughts in more reasoned ‘both sides’ neutrality, because I know the industry I work in and I know what side of the bread is buttered. Which is a shame, because I do see a use for this technology. It is a great aggregator, able to parse and retrieve relevant information through layers of semantic search and structured language application that I truly do not comprehend but am impressed by regularly. If everyone approached it with a measured sense of caution and the fundamental understanding that the fastest answer isn’t always ‘fast’ in the long term… Maybe we wouldn’t be speed-running the destruction of the planet in favour of delivering shareholder value. Data centers won’t nourish me, and aren’t fundamental to the sustained continuance of human life as we know it.
The Faustian bargain isn’t that hard to grasp, but we seem inexorably drawn to it nonetheless.
As evidenced by the incredible digressions and meandering train of thought, this post was entirely written by me. I did briefly alt-tab to make sure I was correctly applying the term ‘Faustian bargain’, because I don’t trust my brain anymore.
My brain is still good, though. It’s fucking amazing. It’s curious and agile and sometimes thinks incredibly poignant things or terrible puns or sometimes both and oftentimes neither. Having that stolen from me under the guise of progress is such short-sighted late-stage capitalist nonsense and it kills my soul.
Thinking about this for too long depresses me in a way that is… Actually incredibly on-brand for my particular misanthropic ‘I used to have a Livejournal and never stopped’ style of navel-gazing, but it’s not good for my mental health. Although writing this post was someone cathartic. None of the words or thoughts are particularly novel, but they’re mine and prove that I can still have them. That my brain is still good.
Look at that. Full circle moment.
